OUP user menu

Activity Pattern Segregation of Carnivores in the High Andes

Mauro Lucherini , Juan I. Reppucci , R. Susan Walker , M. Lilian Villalba , Alvaro Wurstten , Giovana Gallardo , Agustin Iriarte , Rodrigo Villalobos , Pablo Perovic
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-002R.1 1404-1409 First published online: 15 December 2009


Intraguild competition may be reduced if ecologically similar species segregate temporally. Using data from 1,596 camera-trap photos, we present the 1st quantitative analyses of the activity patterns of Andean cats (Leopardus jacobita), Pampas cats (Leopardus colocolo), culpeos (Lycalopex culpaeus), and pumas (Puma concolor) in high-altitude deserts of the Andes. We compared daily activity patterns for these carnivores with those of mountain vizcachas (Lagidium viscacia), the main prey of Andean cats. Activity patterns of all species were positively skewed toward night. Pampas cats displayed the greatest proportion of nocturnal activity, whereas Andean cats were the most diurnal. Activity of Andean cats differed significantly only from that of Pampas cats; Pampas cats also differed from pumas. Activity of Andean cats was generally similar to that of mountain vizcachas. The dissimilar activity patterns of Andean and Pampas cats support the hypothesis of temporal niche segregation of these felids.

Key words
  • camera trapping
  • intraguild competition
  • Lagidium viscacia
  • Lycalopex culpaeus
  • Leopardus colocolo
  • Leopardus jacobita
  • Puma concolor
  • South America

Activity patterns of animals are determined by numerous factors. Abiotic environmental factors such as light and temperature may influence optimum daily and seasonal activity patterns (e.g., Nielsen 1983; Patterson et al. 1999). Body mass, human disturbance, social behavior, predator avoidance, prey acquisition, and competition also may affect activity in different forms (e.g., Bunnell and Harestad 1990; O'Donoghue et al. 1998; Rogowitz 1997). As a result, knowing when animals are active may be important for understanding their ecological niche and, hence, developing conservation plans for imperiled species (Hwang and Garshelis 2007).

The Andean cat (Leopardus jacobita), the Pampas cat (Leopardus colocolo), and the culpeo (Lycalopex culpaeus) are medium-sized carnivores ∼ in arid, high-altitude regions in the Andes of Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, and Chile (Villalba et al. 2004). Increasing evidence suggests that the ranges of these species overlap greatly in the High Andes and that these animals co-occur at the local scale (Lucherini and Luengos Vidal 2003; Lucherini et al. 2008a; Perovic et al. 2003). Intraguild competition has been ∼ to have significant negative effects on carnivore populations (Linnell and Strand 2000; Palomares and Caro 1999), leading to speculation that competition within this South American guild of carnivores may be impacting the most endangered of these species, the Andean cat (Lucherini and Luengos Vidal 2003; Napolitano et al. 2008; Walker et al. 2007a). Interspecific competition can take 2 forms: exploitation and interference. In many cases, in the presence of larger species, small carnivores are affected by both types of competition and their density can be strongly reduced when compared to that expected solely on the basis of prey abundance (Linnell and Strand 2000). Because relative body size is the primary determinant of interspecific killing (Donadio and Buskirk 2006; Fedriani et al. 1999), smaller carnivores in the High Andes can be expected to segregate ecologically with the puma (Puma concolor), the largest carnivore occurring in the region, because of predation risk. Dietary overlap is expected to increase the potential for competition (Donadio and Buskirk 2006); recent studies have reported a relatively high degree of dietary overlap among carnivores in the High Andes, with both culpeos and Pampas cats preying upon mountain vizcachas (Lagidium viscacia), which are the primary prey of the Andean cat (Napolitano et al. 2008; Viscarra Siñani 2008; Walker et al. 2007a).

Intraguild competition may be reduced if ecologically similar species partition their activity temporally (Di Bitetti et al. 2009; Kronfeld-Schor and Dayan 2003). Accordingly, we predicted that temporal segregation of activity would be evident between the species with the greatest potential for competition, namely culpeos and Andean and Pampas cats. Because the Andean cat appears to be the predator most specialized on vizcachas (Walker et al. 2007a), we predicted that activity pattern for this felid should be most similar to that for vizcachas. Here, we test these predictions using camera-trap data obtained from multiple localities in the High Andes. In addition to providing the 1st quantitative data on the activity patterns of Andean cats, Pampas cats, culpeos, and pumas in high-altitude deserts of the Andes, our analyses also will improve our ability to make sound conservation decisions regarding these rare and threatened species.

Materials and Methods

Camera trapping is a noninvasive technique that has been applied successfully to collect information on secretive mammals such as nocturnal carnivores (e.g., Karanth et al. 2004; Kucera and Barrett 1993). In addition to documenting the presence and abundance of such taxa, camera traps that record the date and time at which photos are taken can be used to study the activity patterns of carnivores and other mammals (e.g., Cuéllar et al. 2006; Di Bitetti et al. 2006; Grassman et al. 2006; Maffei et al. 2004; Van Schaik and Griffiths 1996).

Activity data were obtained from 13 sites located in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile, which represent 3 of the 4 countries in which the Andean cat occurs (Fig. 1); camera-trapping surveys were completed as part of studies conducted by the Andean Cat Alliance. Several different models of camera trap were employed (Camtrakker 35 mm was the predominant model; Camtrakker, Watkins ville, Georgia); all used passive infrared detection systems that were programmed to operate continuously and, in most cases, to record the date or hour, or both, of each photograph. To maximize the chances of photographing a carnivore, traps were placed at a height of approximately 30 cm along animal trails close to sites where carnivore signs were observed; in most cases, a lure (bobcat gland or bobcat urine) was placed on the ground in front of the camera. Trapping periods and effort varied among sites.

Fig. 1

Localities (n = 13) at which camera traps were deployed in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile. The approximate number of photos collected at each site is indicated. Ellipses denote regions listed in Table 1.

View this table:
Table 1

Number of photos obtained by sampling region for 4 species of carnivores monitored by camera trapping in the High Andes.

Andean catPampas catCulpeoPumaTotal
Khastor (Bolivia)38728073
Greater Vilama (Argentina)3658572153
San Guillermo (Argentina)0118317111
Sajama-Surire (Chile-Bolivia)72121334
Other sites (pooled)12127417115

To avoid pseudoreplication, when the same camera trap took more than 1 photograph of the same carnivore species in less than 1 h, we counted these photos as 1 event and used the time at which the 1st photo was taken for subsequent analyses of activity. In the case of mountain vizcachas, which live in large colonies with a high density of animals, we adopted a 30-min interval to avoid discarding a large number of photographs that probably corresponded to different individuals. Because per-site and per-hour sample sizes were small in some cases, we pooled the data from all study sites and divided the photos obtained into 4 time periods: day, night, dawn (from 1 h before to 1 h after sunrise), and dusk (from 1 h before to 1 h after sunset—Theuerkauf et al. 2003). We used log-likelihood ratio tests to determine if activity for each species was homogeneously distributed across these 4 temporal periods and to compare activity patterns among species. To avoid an excess of small (<5) expected values, data from dawn and dusk were pooled for these tests; these periods were combined because their samples were the smallest and because of their similar light conditions. To compare activity patterns between species more directly, for each dyad of species we calculated a similarity coefficient index using the percentage similarity (P) of Renkonen (Krebs 1998): Embedded Image

where Pjk is percentage temporal overlap between species j and k, Pij is proportion of the photos in time class i by species j, pik is proportion of photos in time class i by species k, and n is total number of time classes. Values of this index range from 0 to 1, indicating, respectively, no similarity and complete similarity.

The activity of numerous nocturnal mammals is known to vary with the lunar cycle (e.g., Di Bitetti et al. 2006; Kauhala et al. 2006; O'Farrel 1974), presumably because bright moonlight increases the detectability of both prey and predators. To explore the effect of this variable on our activity analyses, activity from all sites was examined as a function of lunar cycle. Data from all species except pumas were pooled for this analysis; pumas were excluded because of sample size. We grouped all night photos into 5 lunar classes: moonless (moon not present or not visible) and 4 categories of increasing brightness, defined by the percentage of illuminated moon (1–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, and 76–100%) visible at the time of the photo. In general, the study area is characterized by clear skies throughout the year. As a result, the percentage of moon visible was determined from the monthly lunar cycle (e.g., quarter moon = 25% illuminated moon visible). We used a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to compare the observed frequency distribution of photos across different moonlight categories against an expected probability distribution generated using 323 points in time (randomly selected from throughout the year) to which we assigned the corresponding category of lunar illumination.


We obtained 1,099 distinct photos of mountain vizcachas and 497 distinct photos of carnivores. These consisted of 93 (19.1%) photos of Andean cats, 90 (18.7%) of Pampas cats, 49 (10.1%) of pumas, 254 (51.1%) of culpeos, and 11 (2.2%) of Molina's hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus chinga). Four main geographical groups of sites could be recognized (Fig. 1; Table 1). For these pooled samples, the mean number of photos per site was 92.8 ±51 ± SD (range = 34–153, n = 4 sites). The largest set of photos was obtained from the Greater Vilama area in northwestern Argentina (Fig. 1; Table 1).

Although photos of the felid and canid species detected were distributed throughout the 4 time periods considered (Fig. 2), photos of hog-nosed skunks were taken exclusively at night. For this reason and because of the small total number of photos for skunks, data for C. chinga were excluded from subsequent analyses. For each of the remaining species, although ≥20% of photos were recorded during the daytime, activity was significantly biased toward night (all likelihood ratio tests > 30, d.f. = 2, all P < 0.0001; Fig. 2). Pampas cats had the highest proportion (71.1%) of nocturnal activity, whereas Andean cats had the greatest proportion (28%) of daytime photos. Andean cats and pumas displayed the greatest proportions (34.4% and 32.7%, respectively) of crepuscular (dawn and dusk) activity. Although the bias toward nocturnal activity was less evident for mountain vizcachas, these rodents were recorded 1.3 times more frequently at night than during the day (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Activity patterns for 4 species of carnivores plus mountain vizcachas, as determined from camera trapping in the high-altitude Andes. The sample size for each species is noted. Data represent the percentage of photos occurring within each of 4 designated subsets of the 24-h light cycle.

Overall, interspecific variation was detected in the percentage of photos recorded during each of the 4 temporal periods considered (likelihood ratio test = 55.5, d.f. = 8, P < 0.0001). Subsequent pairwise comparisons of carnivore species revealed significant differences in activity between Andean and Pampas cats and between Pampas cats and pumas (Table 2). Pairwise comparisons also revealed that although activity of mountain vizcachas differed from that of both Pampas cats and culpeos, no differences in activity were ∼ between vizcachas and either Andean cats or pumas (Table 2). Accordingly, similarity indices revealed that activity patterns were most similar for Andean cats, pumas, and vizcachas, with less similarity detected between Andean and Pampas cats or between Pampas cats and vizcachas (Table 2). Collectively, these findings suggest that activity of Pampas cats is distinct from that of Andean cats and their vizcacha prey.

View this table:
Table 2

Pairwise comparisons of activity patterns for 4 species of Andean carnivores and mountain vizcachas. For each pairwise comparison, the upper half of the table (above the diagonal) shows the likelihood ratio value and corresponding P-value (d.f. = 2 in all cases), whereas the lower half of the table (below the diagonal) presents the values of the Renkonen similarity coefficient index. Significant values for likelihood ratios (P < 0.05) are noted in bold type.

Andean catPampas catCulpeoMountain vizcachaPuma
Andean cat8.310.0164.010.263.350.1870.40.82
Pampas cat84.85.370.06821.5<0.0019.280.01

Andean cats, Pampas cats, and culpeos were all most active during moonless periods (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the 2nd highest percentage of photos for each species was recorded during periods of maximal lunar illumination (Fig. 3). Although Andean cats appeared to be more active during moonless periods than Pampas cats and culpeos (Fig. 3), none of these species showed significant departures from expected patterns of activity, as determined from the frequencies of the different moonlight luminosity categories (Z = 0.4–0.8, d.f. = 4, P > 0.05 for all species), suggesting that predator activity in our study was not influenced by moonlight.

Fig. 3

Percentage of nocturnal photos of Andean carnivores as a function of degree of lunar illumination. Sample size for each species is indicated.


The niche complementarity hypothesis asserts that a high degree of overlap in 1 niche component should be associated with a low degree of overlap in at least 1 other niche dimension (Jimenez et al. 1996; Schoener 1974). Previous studies revealed little evidence of resource partitioning between Pampas and Andean cats. Although the distribution of scats in northern Chile suggested that these species may segregate altitudinally (Napolitano et al. 2008), these authors reported considerable spatial overlap, confirming the suggestion that the spatial distributions of these species overlap substantially (Lucherini and Luengos Vidal 2003; Lucherini et al. 2008a; Perovic et al. 2003).

Temporal segregation is another mechanism that ecologically similar species can use to avoid competition (Kronfeld-Schor and Dayan 2003). Examination of our data suggests that temporal niche segregation may occur between Andean and Pampas cats. The finding that the activity patterns of these 2 felids were more dissimilar than those of other sympatric carnivores is consistent with the prediction that the degree of niche segregation between 2 species tends to increase as their relatedness and morphological similarity increase (Donadio and Buskirk 2006; Odum 1966). In contrast, no evidence of temporal partitioning was ∼ between these felids and culpeos. Culpeos are thought to be greater habitat and dietary generalists than either Andean or Pampas cats (Lucherini et al. 2008b; Viscarra Siñani 2008; Walker et al. 2007a), suggesting that these species can co-occur in the absence of pronounced temporal or other partitioning of the environment.

Because mountain vizcachas are the primary prey item of Andean cats (Napolitano et al. 2008; Walker et al. 2007a) and one of the most important food items—based on biomass ingested—for the other medium-sized carnivores of the High Andes, we had predicted that the activity pattern of this rodent would influence those of its predators. Mountain vizcachas have been described as diurnal-crepuscular (Redford and Eisenberg 1992; Walker et al. 2007b), but examination of our camera-trapping data indicated that they were primarily nocturnal, with a major peak of activity occurring at dawn in high-altitude areas. As expected, Andean cats exhibited a similar pattern of daily activity, whereas the activity pattern for Pampas cats differed from that of vizcachas, which is in agreement with the hypothesis that Andean cats are morphologically specialized to prey on mountain vizcachas (Nowell and Jackson 1996). Thus, dietary specialization on vizcachas appears to be reflected in the activity patterns of the felids examined.

Comparisons of our findings with previously published studies suggest that the activity patterns of the study species may vary geographically. For example, although culpeos in both southern (Johnson and Franklin 1994) and north-central Chile (Salvatori et al. 1999) were active primarily at night, this pattern was less pronounced at the north-central locality. Although examination of our data indicated that Pampas cats were largely nocturnal, in central Brazilian grasslands (the only other area where their activity has been studied), these animals were almost exclusively diurnal (Silveira et al. 2005). This striking discrepancy in activity patterns may be related to the large difference in habitat characteristics between sites, but also may be a consequence of the need to avoid niche overlap with sympatric carnivores in a different guild.

We ∼ evidence of temporal overlap of 2 medium-sized carnivores (culpeos and Andean cats) with pumas, the top-ranking predator of the High Andes. Because relative body size of competitors is the primary determinant of interspecific killing (Donadio and Buskirk 2006), we suggest that these species show segregation in other components of the ecological niche, namely the trophic niche. The puma is the only predator able to prey upon the large mammals occurring in the region (vicunas [Vicugna vicugna] and livestock, such as llamas, donkeys, goats, and sheep), and the scarce information available on its food habits (Cajal and López 1998; Perovic 1998) as well as interviews with local people (Lucherini and Merino 2008; Lucherini et al. 2008b) indicate that large mammals make up most of the diet of pumas. Because trophic overlap has been recognized as influential in predisposing intraguild attacks (Donadio and Buskirk 2006), diet segregation could facilitate tolerance by pumas, especially toward Andean cats, which showed the greatest similarity in activity patterns.

In summary, our results suggest that temporal partitioning contributes to ecological niche segregation among carnivores in the high-altitude Andes. Although our sample sizes, particularly of pumas, are relatively small, studies of these elusive animals are difficult and our data provide the 1st quantitative evidence that daily activity patterns differ among these species, notably the trophically similar Andean and Pampas cats. This temporal segregation may favor the coexistence of these 2 small cats and decrease the importance of intraguild competition as a threat for conservation of the endangered Andean cat.


We are grateful to E. Delgado, P. Cuello, E. Luengos, C. Tellaeche, and all the volunteers and villagers who contributed to data collection, as well as to E. Casanave (Universidad Nacional del Sur), WildCRU (University of Oxford), and the other members of the Andean Cat Alliance for providing advice. Two anonymous referees and E. Lacey greatly improved a previous version of this paper. Our project received support from Wildlife Conservation Network, Darwin Initiative, BP Conservation Programme, Whitley Fund for Nature, Wild About Cats, Cat Action Treasury, Cleveland Zoological Society, Rufford Foundation, International Society for Endangered Cats Canada, and La Torbiera Zoological Society. We acknowledge all the governmental institutions that endorsed and authorized our project, and Administración de Parques Nacionales Argentinos, Reserva Nacional de Fauna Andina Eduardo Avaroa, Colección Boliviana de Fauna for their support. JIR was supported by doctoral scholarships from CONICET.


  • Associate Editor was Eileen A. Lacey.

Literature Cited

View Abstract